Turn mission needs into requirements, designs and tests with less manual preparation. Keep engineering decisions and evidence together so engineers can prepare for project assessments and assurance reviews as the mission develops.
Use mission goals, constraints and existing design information to prepare work engineers can check and build on.
Review the work and evidence against the programme requirements and assessment approach agreed with engineers.
Assess an existing project, or prepare new engineering work and check readiness as you go.
Engineers approve the changes.
Approved work returns to existing tools.
Choose one workflow for a pilot. Compare the effort before and after, using the same task scope and quality expectations.
Measure the hours needed to draft and update requirements, designs and tests that engineers approve.
Track how long a task takes from the first draft to approval, with the sources and checks available to reviewers.
Compare the time spent finding missing records, checking links and preparing for an assessment.
KlugSpice uses mission goals, constraints, interface information and approved sources to prepare requirement, architecture and verification drafts. Engineers can follow the links between the original need, design decisions and the work prepared for review.
Yes. The programme defines its standards, review milestones and evidence expectations. KlugSpice organises work and readiness findings around that scope, without assuming that every space project uses the same assessment model.
Tell us which task takes too much time. See how KlugSpice can help engineers prepare the work and review the result.
