Platform

Less manual work.
More time to engineer.

Finding information, updating documents and chasing evidence can take time away from engineering. KlugSpice helps prepare requirements, designs and tests using your project knowledge, with engineers reviewing every result.

Sound familiar?

Keep the knowledge.
Lose the repeated work.

Finding information, checking changes and updating documents takes time away from engineering. KlugSpice brings project information together and helps prepare the work, so engineers can focus on decisions.

01

Information is hard to find

Requirements, models, code and tests live in different places. Teams spend time rebuilding the picture at every handoff.

02

One change creates more work

Understanding the impact depends on a few experts. The affected designs, tests and evidence still need to be found and aligned.

03

Assessments become a scramble

Missing evidence and outdated documents delay assessment preparation.

KLUGSPICE

Get more engineering done

KlugSpice connects the information, drafts the work and helps keep evidence up to date as your project moves forward.

The platform, in three steps

From scattered information
to work engineers can review.

Spend less time finding information and preparing documents. KlugSpice uses your project knowledge to draft requirements, designs and tests, ready for engineering review.

  1. Bring the project information together

    Bring together standards, company rules, project documents, past work and meeting decisions. See where information came from and what needs checking.

  2. Put specialists to work

    Ask AI to draft requirements, designs or tests, review a change or help prepare assessment evidence using the relevant project information.

  3. Review and return approved work

    Separate agents check the work. Engineers review the draft and its sources, then approve what returns to your tools and informs the next task.

AI for system architecture

Let AI draft
the system architecture.

Turn requirements into model-based systems engineering (MBSE) diagrams. Compare design options and trade-offs before committing to a design.

  • Link components to requirements.
  • Give coding agents the design context.
KlugSpiceSystem architectureSample data
RequirementsControl temperature · Detect sensor faults
Thermal controllerMBSE concept view
«block»Sensor interfaceAcquire readings
«block»Control unitControl + diagnostics
«block»Output driverDrive the actuator
Potential benefit

Fewer computing nodes.

Trade-off

More functions depend on one controller.

Change impact

See what a change
will affect.

Find affected requirements, designs and tests before updating the work.

  • Review connected records together.
  • Focus testing on affected work.
KlugSpiceChange impactSample data
Parking response100 ms → 80 msProposed change
Record details SYS-042Select a node to explore
Traceability

Find the evidence.
Spot the missing links.

Follow requirements through design, tests and evidence. Find gaps before assessment.

  • Keep source links visible.
  • See what needs review.
KlugSpiceTraceabilitySample data
5Requirements
3 / 5All links present
2With gaps
1Needs review
5 requirements shown
RequirementSourceDesignTestEvidenceStatus
MD-012ARCH-017TST-042EV-018Needs review
NEED-006ARCH-021TST-043EV-022Linked
SAFE-009ARCH-023TST-044Missing evidence
NEED-008ARCH-024Missing test
NEED-011ARCH-028TST-046EV-029Linked
Requirement details SYS-042
Respond to a parking request

All links are present, but the proposed response-time change means the requirement and existing test evidence need review.

Defect Intelligence Centre

Turn failures into
clear next actions.

Connect failures to project knowledge. Identify the investigation, owner and next step.

  • Explore possible causes.
  • Link fixes to test evidence.
KlugSpiceDefect intelligenceSample data
Failed testDEF-018

Late temperature warning

The warning misses the configured timing limit.

RUN-031 · Bench test log
Connected project context
RequirementSYS-118

Temperature warning

DesignARCH-018

Warning scheduler

Failed testTST-061

Warning timing test

Investigate

Compare sensor timestamps with warning scheduling.

Suggested ownerControl software team
Verification before closure

Review the fix, rerun the timing test and attach the result before closure.

  1. 01Detect
  2. 02Analyse
  3. 03Assign
  4. 04Resolve
  5. 05Close
Inside KlugSpice

Less searching. Clearer reviews. Familiar tools.

See how KlugSpice helps engineers find the right information, check AI drafts and keep approved work in your existing tools.

Context

Find what you need without rebuilding the picture.

Bring project information together, keep the sources visible and give each task the information it needs.

How we build context
Execution

Give reviewers the information they need to decide.

See how 21 specialists prepare and check the work, while engineers decide what gets approved.

How work gets approved
Your tools

Keep existing tools as the source of record.

Use the requirements, models, code and tests you already have. Agree the connections and return approved work to your tools.

Explore integrations
Across all suites

One foundation for every suite.

Every suite uses the same foundation for specialist agents, reviews, traceability and controlled connections.

Move drafts through accountable reviews.

  • Specialist engineering agents prepare and check the work.
  • Engineers control review and approval.
  • No agent approves its own output.
  • Keep outputs linked to their sources, with a complete audit trail of drafts, checks, reviews and approved updates.

Keep work connected to existing tools.

  • Maintain continuous traceability across the engineering lifecycle.
  • Analyse changes and their impact on connected work.
  • Connect existing ALM, PLM, test and development tools.
  • Export and write back approved work through controlled connections.

Fit the deployment and data policy.

  • Apply role-based access and project isolation.
  • Choose cloud, customer VPC, on-premise or air-gapped deployment.
  • Configure the LLM or enterprise AI model for the deployment.
Useful answers

How the platform fits engineering.

What engineering work can AI agents execute?

KlugSpice agents can prepare stakeholder, system and software requirements; explore architecture options; draft verification assets; analyse changes; and organise assessment evidence. Each task uses relevant project sources and produces work that engineers can review.

Can a team assess existing work before generating new work?

Yes. A team can start by reviewing existing project documents, traceability, test results and review records for evidence gaps. It can also generate new engineering drafts and check readiness as work progresses. The starting point depends on the project and the selected suites.

What connects the six suites?

The Regulatory, Assessment, Requirements, Testing, Architecture and Context suites share project knowledge, source links and review records. This lets a requirement inform architecture, tests, coding context and assessment evidence without rebuilding the project picture at each handoff.

Start with your work

See KlugSpice in action.

Tell us which task takes too much time. See how KlugSpice can help engineers prepare the work and review the result.

Request a trial licenseOne project. One workflow. Clear success criteria.