Move the engineering work forward. Keep the evidence connected.
KlugSpice helps automotive teams turn project knowledge into requirements, designs, tests and assessment preparation. AI prepares and checks the work. Engineers review the sources, resolve findings and approve what moves forward.
Start with the work that slows your team down.
A systems engineer may need to turn a customer change into useful requirements. A verification lead needs to find the affected tests. An assessment coordinator needs the records behind a readiness finding. These tasks share project information, even when their outputs live in different tools.
Automotive SPICE assesses development processes. KlugSpice supports the engineering work and evidence preparation within the scope your team selects. Start by reviewing existing work, preparing new drafts or combining both in one focused workflow.
- Requirements: prepare drafts, acceptance criteria and quality findings linked to their sources.
- Architecture and testing: explore design options, prepare verification assets and review connected changes.
- Assessment preparation: find weak or missing evidence and organise actions for the responsible team.
Give each task the context it needs.
KlugSpice brings together relevant requirements, project documents, rules and recorded decisions. Specialist agents use that context to prepare work; checking agents examine the result before engineering review. Reviewers can inspect the draft and its sources together.
Agree the scope
Choose the project information, workflow, templates, tool connections and review responsibilities for the engagement.
Prepare and check
Draft the selected work, examine quality and traceability, and surface questions that require an engineering decision.
Review and return
Engineers approve the result. Approved work returns through the connections, permissions and process agreed for your tools.
Compare the workflow behind the AI answer.
General AI assistants can help explain an Automotive SPICE term or draft requirement wording. An ASPICE engineering workflow also needs the selected project sources, current versions, traceability, review responsibilities and a controlled path back to existing tools. Evaluate these controls explicitly; a fluent answer alone does not show that they are in place.
KlugSpice brings source-linked preparation, checking agents, engineering review and configured updates into the same workflow. In a pilot, ask the reviewer to trace a proposed requirement back to the customer source, examine an unresolved assumption and see which approval is required before an update returns to the engineering tool.
One customer change. Several engineering decisions.
A changed requirement can affect a design assumption, a test expectation and the evidence used during assessment preparation. Reviewing these records together helps the team decide which work to update.
Make readiness findings useful to the people doing the work.
The Assessment Suite reviews work products, traceability, approvals, baselines and objective evidence against the selected scope. It prepares evidence gaps, suggested process ratings and improvement actions with supporting records.
Engineers review the findings, assign owners and track corrective work. Readiness scores help direct preparation; formal assessment conclusions remain with the responsible assessors. A connected record still needs a quality and relevance check.
Evaluate one workflow with clear success criteria.
Bring a representative requirement set, change request or evidence sample to a demo or pilot. Agree what a useful result looks like: less time preparing a review, clearer findings or less effort locating supporting records. Compare the results with your starting point.
Confirm the required tools, versions, access rules and approved update path at the start. Connection availability and write-back scope depend on the engagement. Your existing engineering tools remain the sources of record.
Further reading
What teams ask before they start.
Can we start with existing project evidence?
Yes. Start with selected documents, traceability links, test results and review records to identify gaps. You can then choose which requirements, designs or verification assets to prepare or improve.
Does KlugSpice replace our requirements or test tools?
Existing tools remain your sources of record. KlugSpice prepares and checks work using agreed project information, then returns approved outputs through the connections and permissions configured for your engagement.
Does using the tool guarantee an ASPICE assessment result?
No. KlugSpice supports engineering review and assessment preparation. Suggested ratings and readiness findings need review, and formal conclusions remain with the responsible assessors.
Bring a requirement. Follow the evidence.
Explore how KlugSpice can support drafting, review and assessment preparation in your project.