Expose orphan artifacts
Find requirements, architectural elements and verification items without the upstream or downstream relationships expected by the project.
ASPICE traceability software
Detect gaps, propose defensible links and understand change impact across requirements, architecture and verification—while reviewers stay in control of every accepted relationship.

Engineering outcomes
Find requirements, architectural elements and verification items without the upstream or downstream relationships expected by the project.
Use semantic and structural context to suggest relationships and show reviewers why each proposal was made.
Track requirement-to-design and requirement-to-verification coverage as the baseline changes, not only before an assessment.
Follow accepted relationships to identify potentially affected work products, owners and verification evidence.
Governed workflow
Connect selected baselines, standards, templates and project rules with role-based access.
Agents analyze the work package and create traceable engineering proposals—not silent repository changes.
Engineers inspect sources, rationale, assumptions and quality checks before accepting any output.
Approved content and links return to controlled systems with provenance and an auditable decision history.
Designed for real programmes
Traceability is useful only when relationships are correct, current and reviewable. KlugSpice helps teams identify candidate links and gaps at scale, then places acceptance with the engineers who understand the system and its evidence.
Controlled repositories remain authoritative. KlugSpice synchronizes reviewed outputs and preserves traceability, provenance and approval state.
Questions buyers ask
Bidirectional traceability connects an artifact to relevant upstream sources and downstream realizations or verification evidence, allowing teams to navigate coverage and change impact in both directions.
AI can propose links with supporting rationale. KlugSpice keeps proposals separate until an engineer reviews and accepts them.
No. It helps analyze and maintain relationships while approved links can remain in the organisation’s controlled ALM repository.
Yes. It can identify requirements without linked verification assets and verification items whose intended requirement coverage is unclear.
A focused pilot connects your sources, runs a governed workflow and gives your engineers concrete outputs to review.
Book a demo